|
fig 4.2/2

retinotopic
re-presentation
(ref 6)
|
fig 4.2/3

retinotopic map (monkey)
(ref 6, 426, 29-7)
Notice that the central portion of the retina
(dark disc
in the upper part of the figure) is overrepresented in the cortex. That
is, more neurons deal with the central retina than with the peripheral
in the cortex. This distortion is known as cortical magnification.
Recall figs I.2/5-6: receptor density is highest, convergence is
lowest,
RF sizes are the smallest, and acuity is the best in the central retina
(also called fovea). This is the region (the fovea) that is
overrepresented
in the cortex.

(Roedick, 1998, The first steps in seeing, p356)
|
fig 4.2/4

tonotopic map (cat)
(ref 3, 357, 8.32)
|
fig 4.2/5

somatotopic map (human)
(ref 5, 182, 1)
Wilder Penfield, a canadian brain surgeon, mapped the cortex using mild
electric current in the 1940s..
|
fig 4.2/6

somatotopic maps:
use dependence
(ref 6)
Another example of cortical magnification and use
depence
of maps. The highest acuity will be in those body regions which
are
magnified in the primary somatosensory cortices. |
fig 4.2/7

use dependent receptive
fields
somatosensory cortex
(ref 11, 227, 9.4)
Reorganization induced by training a
monkey in a behavioral
task engaging a small skin locus (Recanzone, Merzenich et al.). The
cortical
representation of the trained skin portion (black circle) showed a
dramatic
increase; the number of RFs increased; RF overlap increased. Acuity
also
improved. |
fig 4.2/8

referred (phantom)
pain:
somatotopy
(ref 5, 186, 3)
Representation of the amputated hand can be found
on the
face (Ramachandran). That is, stimulation of the face can elicit
sensations
felt in the phantom hand. This observation indicates that phantom
pain
might be related to the proximity of maps of different body parts
within
the somatosensory cortex. Following input removal (amputation),
neighboring
cortical regions invade the silent areas, and transfer their input
there. |